Gazeta Riad | A woman refusing to travel loses her right to food

The mother spends for the son in “cases” and is a debt to his father

A woman refusing to travel loses her right to food

The personal status system established the alimony of parents unknown to the state, unless someone donated to spend for it, and that the maintenance of each person is in his own money, except the wife, who spent it for her husband even if he was Wealthy. and considered food as the right of the consumer and includes food, clothing, shelter and basic necessities. and the consumer’s ability to assess alimony and Article forty-seven allowed food to be in cash and considered an expense to provide money in kind or as a benefit.

When do you hear the food lawsuit?

The articles of the Law on Personal Status confirmed the permissibility of the increase or decrease of alimony according to the change of circumstances, provided that the case for the reduction or increase of alimony is not considered before one year from the date of the ruling on alimony, except in circumstances extraordinary forty assessed by the court.Article forty-nine Continuous alimony is owed to the wife, children and parents from the date of filing the claim to claim it and is considered a privileged debt over all debts except alimony. Examination of the request related to continuous alimony, placement for temporary alimony for the one who is entitled based on his request without the presence of the other party.

Considering the provisions of Article (forty-three) of this system, which states that the wife may refrain from entering and moving into the marital home until she has received her current dowry and the husband has prepared for her the proper dwelling and she has the right to alimony during this period, and if the wife agrees to enter before receiving her dowry remains a debt of the husband and she can claim it at any time she wishes and has no right to refuse thereafter if he has prepare a suitable house for him, taking into account the provisions of this article.

Alimony and discharge

The woman’s right to alimony is not lost except upon fulfillment or dismissal, and the issue of the woman’s alimony has not been heard for a previous period of more than two years from the date of filing of the matter, until she gives birth to her pregnancy. , and according to Article Fifty-four, there is no food for the woman who is expecting death, unless she is pregnant, so she must be food in the pregnancy money until her pregnancy is born. article fifty-five, the wife’s right to alimony falls if she restrains herself from the husband, does not refrain from moving into the marriage house, staying in it or traveling with the husband, without legitimate reason, and article fifty-six says. : The wife lives with her husband in the respective marital home, unless otherwise provided in the marriage contract, and in accordance with Article fifty-seven the husband lives with his wife in the marital home, his parents and children by others when the expenses are charged to them, provided that this does not cause any harm to the wife and the wife has the right to live with her in the marital home. Her children are not married. c If they do not have another guardian or if they are harmed by leaving him, or if the husband agrees to this explicitly or implicitly, and the husband has the right to give up when harmed by this, but if both spouses share in the ownership of the marital apartment, rent it or provide it, neither of them can live with them without the consent of the other.

The mother spends for the son

According to Article Fifty-eight, alimony for the child is compulsory for the sole father, if the father is wealthy or able to earn, and without prejudice to paragraph (1) of this Article, alimony. it is obligatory for the son until he reaches the extent that his peers can earn, and for the daughter until he marries, and Article fifty-nine clarifies the case where the rich father does not spend and stipulates that “in case the rich father does not spends or lacks and he has no money of which to spend for the child, the mother spends for the child if she is rich and if she is disabled, the one for whom food is sought. has the one who spent it, if he intended to return it to the father when he spent it and the request for recourse is not heard for alimony, which exceeds (one year) before the filing date of the lawsuit.

alimony for wealthy heirs

In accordance with article sixty, taking into account the provisions of article (fifty-nine) of this system, in case of death, loss or bankruptcy of the father, the child support is owed to the one who inherits from his wealthy relatives according to the parts their inheritance from him, and the father is bound, under section sixty-one, in the fee for breastfeeding his child. wife, and this is considered food, and Article sixty-two states that parents who are not good are all obliged or supplemented by wealthy children – to the extent of their inheritance – old or young, even if the parents are in able to win and only Article 63 If ​​one of the children spends for the parents or one of them and does not intend to return to his brothers, he has no right to claim them. If, at the time of his spending, he intends to return to them – on his part – then he can do so, provided that the matter is not considered for a previous period of more than (one hundred and eighty) days from the date of submission of the case, and in accordance with Article sixty-four, without prejudice to the provisions of alimony relating to children and parents included in this system Food of any person entitled to alimony – who is unable to to win – must be paid by his wealthy heirs according to their share in the inheritance from him.

Article 65 states that if there are many food users and the one who is obliged to keep them is not able to keep them all, the wife’s food will be provided, then the children’s food, then the parents’s food; Then the food for the relatives, then for the relatives, and according to article sixty-six and taking into account the provisions of article (fifty-nine) of this system, the food of the relative is extinguished upon the expiration of the term, unless it has been spent on him. , except the one who is obliged to return, and the request for recourse is not reviewed with a maintenance obligation that exceeds (one hundred and eighty) days from the date of filing the lawsuit.

Leave a Comment